Manning v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CRAVEN, Chief Judge.
On motion for summary judgment, the court does not, strictly speaking, find facts, but, instead, in the appropriate case, may conclude that in one or more aspects there is no genuine dispute as to the material facts and that the controlling factor is one of law. Even so, it is not improper to narrate what the facts appear to be in order to demonstrate that the case is an appropriate one for summary judgment. 3 Barron & Holtzoff, Federal Practice & Procedure Section 1242, p. 20 (rev. ed. 1958).
From the pleadings, statements of counsel, and answers to interrogatories, *621the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jyachosky v. WensilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Barger v. M. & J. Finance Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Mattox v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
3Cited by3 opinions
- DeArmon v. B. Mears Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- National Life Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Jerome Silverman, Carroll Arms Associates, a District of Columbia Limited Partnership v. National Life Insurance Company, a Vermont Corporation, A/K/A National Life of VermontCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- National Life Insurance v. SilvermanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971