Matter of Welfare of AY-J.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Appellant Andre Jones challenges the termination of his parental rights to his son, A.Y.-J. Specifically, appellant contends the district court’s decision to proceed with the termination hearing in his absence denied him due process of law. He also contends the district court erred in making its findings of fact and conclusions of law based on the evidence presented. Because the district court’s proceeding did not deny appellant due process of law and because the district court did not err in making its findings of fact and conclusions of law, we affirm.
FACTS
A.Y.-J was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re the Welfare of M.D.O.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Dunshee v. DouglasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Matter of Welfare of HGBSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Matter of Welfare of RosenbloomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- In Re the Welfare of J.W.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HagertyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Daley v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- In Re the Child of SimonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- In Re the Child of SimonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003