Legal Opinion

State v. . Bradsher

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 22, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant excepted to portions of the charge of the court to the jury. He contends that there was no evidence from which the jury could find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the quart fruit jar which he threw from his automobile while the officers were pursuing him contained intoxicating liquor. He testified that it contained gasoline which he had bought from a colored man, and that he had not drunk any intoxicating liquor during the day on which he was arrested.

While no witness testified that the fruit jar contained intoxicating liquor, there was evidence from which the jury could find facts…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. . PierceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. State v. . BradsherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API