State v. . Bradsher
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
Defendant excepted to portions of the charge of the court to the jury. He contends that there was no evidence from which the jury could find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the quart fruit jar which he threw from his automobile while the officers were pursuing him contained intoxicating liquor. He testified that it contained gasoline which he had bought from a colored man, and that he had not drunk any intoxicating liquor during the day on which he was arrested.
While no witness testified that the fruit jar contained intoxicating liquor, there was evidence from which the jury could find facts…
2Cited by2 opinions
- State v. . PierceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- State v. . BradsherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925