Legal Opinion

Æolian Co. v. Royal Music Roll Co.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided June 18, 1912PublishedCited by 23 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the iEolian Company against the Royal Music Roll Company. On motion for preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

HAZED, District Judge.

The question raised in this case involves the right of the complainant, the TColian. Company, under the copyright act of March 4, 1909, to restrain the defendant, the Royal Music Roll Company, from copying and duplicating perforated music rolls or records manufactured by the former. While, under the provisions of the copyright law, such music rolls or records are not strictly matters of copyright, Congress in passing the enactment evidently intended to protect copyright proprietors in their right to their productions, and to give them an exclusive right to print,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. StrausSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Capitol Records, Inc. v. Mercury Records CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  3. Edward B. Marks Music Corporation v. Colorado Magnetics, Inc., D/B/A Sound Values, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  4. Duchess Music Corporation v. Martin SternCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  5. Gai Audio of New York, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API