Legal Opinion

Kalis v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 10, 2003No. 1-01-2827PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNULTY

The instant appeal arises from a simple set of undisputed facts: a plaintiff in a products liability action received an offer of settlement from the defendant manufacturer but did not respond before the defendant prevailed in its motion for summary judgment. Since the settlement proposal had contained no time limit or other conditions for acceptance, the plaintiff notified the defendant that she would take the offer and was promptly informed that the offer was no longer open. While the products liability litigation continued, the plaintiff filed the action underlying this matter: a claim…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Steinberg v. Chicago Medical SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Kerns v. EngelkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Keller v. State Farm InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  4. Kerns v. EngelkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. F.H. Prince & Co. v. Towers Financial Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Insurance v. American Hardware Manufacturers Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  2. Kalis v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. People v. RogersAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  4. Transmontaigne Product Services, Inc. v. M/V Wilbur R. ClarkDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2009
  5. Bayer HealthCare LLC v. Aeropres CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API