Legal Opinion
Valencich v. TMT Homes of Oregon, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided April 14, 2004No. C981168CV; A113925; C981167CV; A113927; D983711CV; A113926PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Cumberland Casualty and Surety Company (Cumberland) appeals from a judgment in favor of Valencich, a landscaper, allowing recovery against surety bonds that were filed in three consolidated lien foreclosure actions. Cumberland argues that, because it was not a party in the foreclosure actions, it was not subject to the entry of a judgment against it in those actions and the trial court accordingly erred in entering judgment against it. We affirm.
The facts are undisputed. TMT Homes of Oregon, Inc. (TMT), is a contractor that developed a subdivision in Beaverton, Oregon. It employed Valencich…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Monmouth Lumber Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Drake v. SwortsOregon Supreme Court · 1893
- Tualatin Valley Builders Supply, Inc. v. TMT Homes of Oregon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Micah A. Curtis & Angela L. Curtis and Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Jerry Lee Rhodes & Bonnie M. CochranWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
- Man-Data, Inc. v. B & a AUTOMOTIVE, INC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Micah A. Curtis & Angela L. Curtis and Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Jerry Lee Rhodes & Bonnie M. CochranWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
- Inland Empire Dry Wall Supply Co. v. W. Sur. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2018
- Inland Empire Dry Wall Supply Co. v. W. Sur. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2018