People v. Dolce
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Evidence of appellant’s silence while under arrest when incriminating statements were made in his presence by his co-defendant Russo in reply to a police officer was received in reliance on Kelley v. People (55 N. Y. 565, 572-574) as admissions of the truth of such statements sufficient to establish appellant’s guilty participation in the conspiracy.
While the objection was not directed specifically to this point, the exception to the ruling under which the statements were received was sufficient to raise the question.
In People v. Rutigliano (261 N. Y. 103) we have held that a person in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. RutiglianoNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Kelley v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. PignataroNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Kosh v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Mezzatesta v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
- People v. RodriguezNew York Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. AbelNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.