Legal Opinion

People v. Dolce

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1933PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Evidence of appellant’s silence while under arrest when incriminating statements were made in his presence by his co-defendant Russo in reply to a police officer was received in reliance on Kelley v. People (55 N. Y. 565, 572-574) as admissions of the truth of such statements sufficient to establish appellant’s guilty participation in the conspiracy.

While the objection was not directed specifically to this point, the exception to the ruling under which the statements were received was sufficient to raise the question.

In People v. Rutigliano (261 N. Y. 103) we have held that a person in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. RutiglianoNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Kelley v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1874

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. PignataroNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Kosh v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Mezzatesta v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
  4. People v. RodriguezNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  5. People v. AbelNew York Court of Appeals · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API