Legal Opinion
Fraser v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided May 15, 1920No. Claim No. 15,818; Claim No. 15,819; Claim No. 15,820; Claim No. 15,821; Claim No. 15,822; Claim No. 15,823PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Claims for damages for negligence.
1Opinion of the CourtMorschauser, J.
The above claimants filed a claim for damages alleged to have been sustained by them *21on the 30th day of May, 1917. The claimants Mary E. Cass and Allan Fraser occupied the front seat of an automobile, and the other claimants were occupying the back part of the same automobile, and had left Buffalo in the morning for the purpose of taking a trip to Eochester, N. Y., and having a day’s outing. They arrived in Eochester late in the afternoon, and from there proceeded to Irondequoit bay, where the party had dinner. After dinner the party proceeded back to Eochester and westerly along Main street…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Smith v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Culhane v. . N.Y. Cen. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Glennon v. . Erie Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Fowler v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1893
- Matutinovich v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Spreitler v. Louisville & N. R.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- Seregos v. C. W. Good, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Melia v. Southern Boulevard RailroadCity of New York Municipal Court · 1936