Legal Opinion
Stephens v. McCormack
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided February 6, 1928No. 2788PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Ducker, J.:
This is an action to enforce contribution between sureties. The complaint sets forth two causes of action, the facts of which, substantially stated, are as follows: One W. E. Pruett was duly appointed as trustee of the bankrupt estate of Oscar J. Smith and Minnie D. Smith, on or about the 2d day of November, 1911. On the 10th day of November, 1911, he filed his bonds as such trustee, with Henry Stephens and respondent, J. M. McCormack, as sureties upon each of said bonds, and continued to act as such trustee until June 16, 1921, when he resigned. During the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Thomas v. Pacific Beach Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- McCarthy v. Mount Tecarte Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Hall v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Kreider v. IsenbiceIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Darrow v. SummerhillTexas Supreme Court · 1899
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Schumacher v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 2006
- El Ranco, Inc. v. NEW YORK MEAT AND PROVISION CO.Nevada Supreme Court · 1972
- Davis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1982
- El Ranco, Inc. v. NEW YORK MEAT AND PROVISION CO.Nevada Supreme Court · 1972
- El Ranco, Inc. v. NEW YORK MEAT AND PROVISION CO.Nevada Supreme Court · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.