Legal Opinion

Mapp v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 22, 1991No. A91A0314PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Judge.

After a jury trial, in which he was represented by appointed counsel and convicted on two counts of obstruction of a law enforcement officer, Mapp brings this pro se appeal.

We address only Mapp’s contention that the trial court erred by not appointing counsel to represent him on appeal. Prior to and during the trial, Mapp was represented by appointed counsel. He was convicted and sentenced on January 31,1990, and while still incarcerated after the conviction, proceeded pro se to file a timely notice of appeal on February 6 and 7, 1990. On June 18, 1990, the court granted Mapp’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McAuliffe v. RutledgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  2. Bostick v. RickettsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. Burnett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mapp v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  2. Spear v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. Hawkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Massey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. Murray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API