Legal Opinion

State v. Holt

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 24, 2017No. 113990Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 113,990 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. WILLIAM D. HOLT II, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. K.S.A. 2015 Supp. 21-6604(b)(1) requires the sentencing court to order the defendant to pay restitution unless the court finds compelling circumstances that would render a plan of restitution unworkable. 2. Under K.S.A. 2015 Supp. 21-6604, restitution is the rule and a finding that restitution is unworkable is the exception. It is the defendant's burden to come forward with evidence regarding an alleged inability to pay restitution. 3. An appellate…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. State v. DickeySupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  3. State v. HoltSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  4. State v. HunzikerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  5. State v. ApplegateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API