Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Insurance v. Reeves

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 8, 1982No. 82-85PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERSEY, Judge.

Appellant, worker’s compensation insurance carrier, seeks to overturn a determination of the trial court made pursuant to Section 440.39(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1981).

The operable portion of the statute provides:

The employer or carrier shall recover from the judgment, after attorney’s fees and costs incurred by the employee or dependent in that suit have been deducted, 100 percent of what it has paid and future benefits to be paid, unless the employee or dependent can demonstrate to the court that he did not recover the full value of damages sustained because of comparative…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State, Dept. of Health v. CulmerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. SimonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hewitt, Coleman & Associates v. GrattanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Division of Risk Management v. Nationwide Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API