Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Pipkin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 17, 1914Published

Appeal from Morgan Chancery Court. Heard before Hon. W. H. Simpson. Bill by Jere Murpby against J. W. Pipkin and others, to annul a conveyance as a fraud on creditors. Decree dismissing the bill, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion

ON REHEARING.

SAYRE, J.

On application for rehearing, appellees have addressed their argument, that appellant has not shown his ownership of the judgment, to this point specifically : That the conveyances purporting to have been executed by Hiram Doll, special master commissioner under appointment by the court of common pleas of the county of Stark, and state of Ohio, and by J. J. Sullivan, trustee in bankruptcy of the Aultman Company, under authority of the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio-, Eastern Division, are not shown to have been executed by competent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. East v. PaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  2. Kennedy v. DearSupreme Court of Alabama · 1837

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API