Legal Opinion
Freese v. Dep't of Soc. Servs. Gustav Cariglio
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 29, 2017No. AC38045, AC38083PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.
*67 Our Supreme Court has construed remedial statutes liberally to give effect to their purpose. See Dorry v. Garden , 313 Conn. 516 , 533, 98 A.3d 55 (2014). The plaintiffs, Kathleen Freese and Gustav Cariglio, 1 appeal from judgments of the trial court dismissing their administrative appeals. The principal issue in these cases is whether General Statutes § 52-109, 2 a *242 remedial savings statute, could be utilized by the plaintiffs to save from dismissal their administrative appeals commenced in the names of the wrong persons as plaintiffs.
In these consolidated administrative appeals, the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ajadi v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- New England Rehabilitation Hospital of Hartford, Inc. v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Carbone v. Zoning Board of Appeals of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Chieppo v. Robert E. McMichael, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Dilieto v. County Obstetrics & Gynecology Group, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Tax Funding, LLC v. Design Land Developers of Newtown, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- Varnum Properties, LLC v. DC Department of Consumer and Reglatory AffairsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co., N.A. v. AndersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2026