Legal Opinion

Eureka Producing Co. v. Hoyt

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 7, 1924No. 10692PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConner, C. J.

This is an appeal from á judgment in appellee’s favor for $1,185.35 as damages for a failure on appellant’s part to deliver certain damaged' oil Well casing which appellee had purchased.

Appellee, plaintiff below, alleged, in substance,- that about December 10, 1921, he entered into a contract with the defendant corporation acting through its agent, E. W. Bis-sett, for the purchase of certain oil well-casing and supply pipe; that said pipe was of various sizes ranging from 5%, to 12 Vi inches amounting in all to about 4,000 feet; that at the same time he also purchased 2,000 feet of first…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jones v. GeorgeTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Pacific Express Co. v. Darnell Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Fraser & Chalmers v. Echo Mining & Smelting Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  4. Joske Bros. v. PleasantsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  5. Rippy v. HarlowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vise v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  2. Dale Oil & Refining Co. v. City of TuliaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Modern Aero Sales, Inc. v. Winzen Research, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Grossman v. LiedekerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  5. Vise v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API