United States v. Houston

SEFTON, Senior Judge:

We have examined the record of trial, the single assignment of error,1 and the Government’s response. We conclude that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant was committed.

A military judge sitting as a special court-martial tried appellant on 4 and 18 November and 4 December 1996. Pursuant to his provident pleas of guilty, he was convicted of making a false official statement, four speeifi-*862cations of wrongfully uttering checks, and a single specification of dishonorable…