UNDISCLOSED LLC v. THE STATE
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
302 Ga. 418
FINAL COPY S17A1061. UNDISCLOSED LLC v. THE STATE. PETERSON, Justice. Alexander Hamilton famously observed in Federalist 78 that courts “have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment.” Notwithstanding this general principle, the Georgia Constitution does confer on us some carefully defined room for the exercise of will: it vests in this Court the power to approve rules for each class of court in this State. That is a policymaking power. We can approve or disapprove a proposed rule based on whether we think it’s a good idea. But once we’ve approved a rule, our policymaking role…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. AmodeoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- McBurney v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.