Legal Opinion
Shaw v. Walter E. Heller & Co.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided June 21, 1966No. 9149PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT AND FINDINGS
SIDNEY O. SMITH, Jr., District Judge.
This is a suit in which the- plaintiff Trustee in Bankruptcy seeks to recover as alleged preferential transfers some $295,298.89 passing to the defendant factor from the bankrupt manufacturer during the four-months period preceding adjudication in bankruptcy. The Trustee contends that all of such transactions constitute preferences under Section 60 of the Bankruptcy Act (11 U.S.C.A. § 96).
As background, it is necessary to understand that the defendant factor had done business with the bankrupt and its predecessor (Croft…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Benedict v. RatnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Walker v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1924
- Robert K. Mayo, as Trustees in Bankruptcy of Twin City Construction Company, Inc., Bankrupt v. Pioneer Bank & Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Engstrom v. WileyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Alex Wolf as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Regent Case Co., Inc., Bankrupt v. Aero Factors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bernstein v. Alpha Associates, Inc. (In Re Frigitemp Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Tucson House Construction Co. v. FulfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Gordon v. Rogich (In re Alpha Protective Servs., Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2018
- Gordon v. Hackenberry (In re Alpha Protective Servs., Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2018
- Tucson House Construction Company v. FulfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967