Legal Opinion
Young v. Pennsylvania House of Representatives
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 18, 1998No. Civil Action 1:CV-97-1873PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CALDWELL, District-Judge.
Plaintiff, Peddrick M. Young, Sr., alleges that Defendant, the Republican Caucus of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives, terminated his employment in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§.621-34 (“ADEA”). Before us is Defendant’s motion to dismiss.
I. Background
Plaintiff was employed by Defendant from 1986 until his termination in 1996. At the time of his discharge, Plaintiff was sixty years old. Plaintiff alleges that he was replaced with a younger employee, and that his termination was due to his age. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Navedo v. MaloneyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Pease v. University of Cincinnati Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1998