Stop-N-Go of Western Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
NARICK, Senior Judge.
The issue presented on appeal is whether the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) erred by finding Ann J. Brackus (Claimant) did not harass a coworker at work in violation of her employer’s harassment policy and therefore was not guilty of willful misconduct.
Stop-N-Go of Western Pennsylvania, Inc. (Employer) appeals from an order of the Board that affirmed the referee’s decision granting benefits under the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law), Act of December 5,1936, Second Ex.Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §§ 751 — 914.
Claimant worked full-time…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Walker v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- County of Luzerne v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Flores v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Jordon v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Clowney v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Continuous Metal Technology, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- R.D. Anderson v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- The Philadelphia Parking Auth. v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024