Legal Opinion
Quagliano v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 27, 1968No. 65 Civ. 3412PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MacMAHON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs move under Rule 60(b) (6), Fed.R.Civ.P., to vacate and set aside a judgment entered against them for failure to prosecute. Rule 41(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. Defendants Maria Vito and Edward A. Vito cross-move for interest on the proceeds of the National Service Life Insurance policy which was the subject of this action. We will consider the motions in order.
This action was instituted on November 12, 1965. Plaintiffs, wife and child *671of decedent Michael Quagliano and originally the beneficiaries of two National Service Life Insurance policies issued on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. WorleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Edward Davis v. United Fruit Company, Defendant-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Joseph Schwarz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Barnes v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chaudhry v. Ksenzowski (In Re Ksenzowski)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1985
- Ternes v. KnispelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Acosta v. Reparto Saman Inc. (In re Acosta)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2013
- Sinva, Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Vitarelle v. Long Island RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.