Legal Opinion

Hotard v. Aegis Security Insurance Company

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided January 8, 2025No. 2:23-cv-06003Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA RULLEY HOTARD * CIVIL ACTION * VERSUS * NO. 23-6003 * AEGIS SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY * SECTION "L" (5) ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court is a Motion to Enforce Settlement filed by Defendant Aegis Security Insurance Company (“Aegis”). R. Doc. 22. Plaintiff Rulley Hotard (“Plaintiff”) did not oppose or otherwise respond to the motion. Considering the record, briefing, and applicable law, the Court now rules as follows. I. BACKGROUND & PRESENT MOTION This case arises out of an insurance contract dispute related to damages sustained by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Adrian Cavallini v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  4. Dr. Bettye R. Langley v. Jackson State University and Dr. Herman Smith, in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. Rivett v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API