Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Rice

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 16, 2013No. Appellate Case No. 2009-141166; No. 27210Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Pleicones

I agree with the majority that our state’s juvenile waiver procedure does not implicate Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). I write separately, however, because I do not agree that appellant’s decision to plead guilty in general sessions court waived his right to appeal the family court’s waiver decision.

The circuit court has jurisdiction over an appeal from a family court order in only one circumstance: when the family court judge has denied the State’s request to transfer a matter that charges a juvenile with murder or with criminal sexual conduct.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. State v. PittmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Travelscape, LLC v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  5. Video Gaming Consultants, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API