Legal Opinion

State v. Chisolm

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 2, 2003No. 3649PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOREHEAD, Acting Judge:

Christopher M. Chisolm appeals his convictions for distribution of crack cocaine and distribution of crack cocaine within the proximity of a school. Chisolm argues the trial court erred: (1) in failing to suppress drug evidence; and (2) in denying his motion for a directed verdict on the proximity charge. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

FACTS

Rosie Jones purchased crack cocaine from Chisolm while acting as a confidential informant for the York County MultiJurisdictional Drug Enforcement Unit (DEU), a division of the Rock Hill Police Department.

On May 9,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  2. State v. BurdetteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. McHoneySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  4. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  5. State v. CribbSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SweetSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  2. State v. HatcherSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  3. State v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  4. State v. HatcherCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API