Legal Opinion

Boardman v. Ward

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 30, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Goodhue county, where the action was tried by O. M. Hall, Esq., as referee.

1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.

The plaintiff sues to recover the value of her services alleged by her to have been rendered for defendant from the-16th day of July, 1885, to the 27th day of August, 1887. Defendant in his answer alleges that the plaintiff, at her own request, resided with him during the time referred to, and that the services were voluntarily rendered by her in assisting his wife in the household work, and that she received board, clothing, and care as a member of his family, which were an equivalent for such services. The case was *400tried before a referee, and comes here upon appeal from a judgment in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rickard v. StantonNew York Supreme Court · 1836

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sanders v. . RaganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Dusenka v. DusenkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. Hickam v. HickamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  5. Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API