Legal Opinion

Holbrook v. State

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 24, 1965PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWebber, J.

On May 12, 1964 the petitioner filed a petition for the writ of habeas corpus signed by him and verified as required by statute. A court appointed counsel was duly assigned to represent him. On July 8, 1964 an amended petition was filed and the original petition was treated as withdrawn. The amended petition was signed only by counsel. The verification thereof, however, was signed by the petitioner and his oath thereto was taken. The State seasonably filed a motion to dismiss based upon two grounds, (1) that the amended petition fails to allege valid facts evidencing a basis for the issuance…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Arrington v. Warden of the Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  4. Tuttle v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1962
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Watters v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. PullenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
  2. Nadeau v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  3. Paradis v. Webber HospitalSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  4. Pineland Lumber Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  5. Davis v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API