Taylor v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Appellant seeks review of an order denying without a hearing his motion for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because we conclude that appellant has asserted a claim based upon newly discovered evidence which is sufficient to entitle him to an eviden-tiary hearing, we reverse.
In his motion, appellant requests permission to withdraw his plea of guilty “as a matter of convenience,” * entered in November 1993, to the charge of sale or delivery of cocaine. He alleges that he entered his plea, while maintaining his innocence, after having explained…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rigabar v. BroomeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
3Cited by1 opinion
- Veach v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998