Legal Opinion

Morris Cohon & Co. v. Russell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 15, 1968PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEager, J.

This action is brought to recover in quantum meruit for the alleged services rendered by plaintiff as a broker or finder in procuring a purchaser for defendant’s stockholdings in a certain close corporation. The plaintiff alleges it is a dealer in securities and does not claim to be a duly licensed real estate broker. The defendant has interposed the Statute of Frauds as *223a defense and appeals from an order which denied his motion for summary judgment.

The applicable statute is section 5-701 of the General Obligations Law, which now reads as follows:

“ Every agreement, promise or undertaking is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Poel v. . Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Wright v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Wilson v. . Lewiston Mill Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Stulsaft v. Mercer Tube & Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. Coleman v. GarriguesNew York Supreme Court · 1854

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dr. Werner Oswald v. Jane B. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  2. Oswald v. AllenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  3. Dr. Werner Oswald v. Jane B. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API