Wooden v. State

Appellant, Joe Wooden, challenges the trial court’s assessment of various costs following his vehicular manslaughter conviction. Because the trial court erred in imposing two of the challenged costs, we reverse as to only those costs.

As the State concedes, the trial court erred in assessing a $50 “Crimes Preven*889tion” cost without reference to statutory authority for imposing such a cost. See Smiley v. State, 704 So.2d 191, 194-95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Bradshaw v. State, 638 So.2d 1024, 1025 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). The State further concedes that the trial court erred in assessing a $370 cost for…