Legal Opinion
United States v. Swisher
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided February 13, 2011No. Nos. 1:09-CV-055-BLW, 1:07-CR-182-BLWPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Pending before the Court is Movant Elven Joe Swisher’s (“Swisher”) Motion to Permit Discovery (Dkt. 14). Having reviewed the Motion, the Government’s Response (Dkt. 15), Swisher’s Reply (Dkt. 16),1 and the underlying criminal record, the Court enters the following Order denying the Motion for Discovery.
BACKGROUND
The facts underlying this case are extremely complex. The Court will only briefly summarize those necessary to resolve the discovery motion.
Swisher sought benefits from the Veteran’s Administration (“VA”) claiming that he suffered from…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bracy v. GramleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Arthur Calderon, Warden v. The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Robert Henry Nicolaus, Real-Party-In-InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Darrell Keith Rich v. Arthur Calderon, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Campbell v. BlodgettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Velazquez-Rivera v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014