Legal Opinion
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. M/V Ciudad De Turbo
District Court, S.D. Alabama
Decided August 12, 1971No. Civ. A. No. 5746-69PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DANIEL HOLCOMBE THOMAS, Chief Judge.
The above-styled ease was regularly set down for trial on June 16, 1971, and after hearing and considering the evidence, exhibits and arguments of counsel, the Court makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:
FINDING OF FACTS
1. This is an in rem action by the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company (L&N) against the M/V Ciudad De Turbo1 for damages suffered by the *770fender system of L&N Bridge Number 200 on the Chickasawbogue in Mobile, Alabama.
2. The Ciudad De Turbo struck the northeast fender of Bridge Number 200 with the starboard…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Patterson Terminals, Inc. v. S.S. Johannes FransDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. American Commercial Line, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1970
- Sabine Towing & Transportation Co. v. St. Joe Paper Co.District Court, N.D. Florida · 1968
- Ernest Construction Co. v. The Tug CommodoreDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Freeport Sulphur Company v. The S/s Hermosa, Her Engines, Tackle, Apparel, Furniture, Etc., in Rem, Pansuiza Compania De Navigacion S.A., in PersonamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Georgia Ports Authority v. L/S BILDERDYKDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1975
- St. Charles Parish Waterworks District No. 2 v. Point Landing, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Alabama v. National Marine Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1977
- Freeport Sulphur Company v. The S/s Hermosa, Her Engines, Tackle, Apparel, Furniture, Etc., in Rem, Pansuiza Compania De Navigacion S.A., in PersonamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976