Legal Opinion

Zarrow v. Whisler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 7, 1924No. 13371PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion 'by

RAY, C.

Plaintiffs in error contend that the court erred — (1) In overruling defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence, (2) In excluding certain evidence offered by the defendants, and (3) In its instruction to the jury.

1. Plaintiff adduced evidence to show that on April 20, 1920, the parties entered into a written contract by the terms of which the Zarrows sold to Whisler a stock of goods at the invoice price, to be invoiced about October 1st, and that at the time of signing- the contract Whisler paid $300 on the contract price, balance to be paid at the time of the invoice. By…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Campbell v. VanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API