Legal Opinion
Ravenscroft v. Casey
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 5, 1944No. 123PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
Without the assistance of an attorney the plaintiff filed her complaint, followed by an amended complaint, to recover damages for assault, false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. Upon motions made by ten of the defendants, the district court ruled in an opinion filed November 3, 1941, that the amended complaint fails to state against any of them a claim upon which relief can be granted. An order and judgment of dismissal without costs was entered on December 2. 1941. Thereafter on March 6, 1942 an order and judgment was entered dismissing without costs the amended…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Yaselli v. GoffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Standard Oil Co. v. City of LincolnSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Marks v. . TownsendNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Lange v. . BenedictNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Graham v. Buffalo General Laundries Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- William Whirl v. C. v. (Buster) Kern and Fidelity and Deposit Company of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Rhodes v. HoustonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1962
- James Francis v. Arthur T. LymanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954
- Patterson v. Von RiesenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Jesse Engebretson v. Mike MahoneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.