Legal Opinion · Dissent

King v. Piedmont-Warner Development

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 4, 1985No. 70965Published

1DissentBeasley, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

OCGA § 34-9-104 (a) defines the term “change in condition” as a “change in the wage-earning capacity, physical condition, or status of an employee . . . , which change must have occurred after the date on which the wage-earning capacity, physical condition, or status of the employee . . . was last established by award or otherwise.” In this case, the claimant is seeking the resumption of disability income benefits based on a change in his wage-earning capacity. He is receiving 10% permanent partial disability and has not attempted to change that.

After a period of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. BristolSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  2. Georgia Power Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Gilmer v. Atlanta Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  4. Cornell-Young (Macon &C. Co.) v. MinterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. Augusta Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API