Legal Opinion

Lipinsky v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelix O. Benvenga, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries and death of plaintiff’s intestate, resulting from the negligence of the defendant in maintaining the sidewalk and curbing at the intersection of Second Avenue and East Fifth Street, Manhattan.

The evidence shows the existence, at the place of the alleged accident, of a separation in the metal nosing or curbing of about an inch and a difference in elevation of about three fourths of an inch. It do not believe that the defect is of such a character as to impose liability, or of such a nature that a reasonably prudent person should have…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ingersoll v. Liberty Bank of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Styler v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1952

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lipinsky v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  2. Parker v. Port of New York AuthorityCity of New York Municipal Court · 1959
  3. People v. TateNew York Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API