Legal Opinion
Broadhurst v. Employees Retirement System
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided August 30, 2002No. 03-01-00652-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID PURYEAR, Justice.
Nancy Broadhurst appeals the district court’s judgment affirming a final order by the Board of Trustees for the Employees Retirement System of Texas (“Board” or “ERS”) denying her application for occupational disability retirement benefits (“retirement benefits”). On appeal, Broad-hurst continues to challenge the Board’s order, alleging that it was arbitrary and capricious and incorrectly interpreted the statute governing her claim. We will affirm the judgment of the district court.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Broadhurst was employed as a Child Protective Services…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- National Liability & Fire Insurance Co. v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- City of El Paso v. Public Utility CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Mireles v. Texas Department of Public SafetyTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Railroad Commission v. Torch Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
- Chevron Corp. v. RedmonTexas Supreme Court · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Zurich American Insurance Co. v. GillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Larimore v. Employees Retirement System of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
- Bradford E. Larimore v. Employees Retirement System of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
- Bradford E. Larimore v. Employees Retirement System of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
- Bradford E. Larimore v. Employees Retirement System of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.