Legal Opinion
Romaro Corp. v. Sea & Sky Garden, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 21, 2003PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiffs did not breach a contract with the defendants, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cammer, J.), dated May 1, 2002, which, inter alia, granted the plaintiffs’ motion to direct them to file a subdivision application and denied that branch of their motion which was to quash and/or modify a subpoena duces tecum.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, with costs.
The Supreme Court directed the defendants to file a subdivision application…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- In re Grand Jury Subpoenas for Local 17, 135, 257 & 608 of United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People ex rel. Smalls v. TekbenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by8 opinions
- Asher v. GiganteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Matter of Henry St. Invs., Ltd. v. BrennanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Yemini v. GoldbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Dawson v. WileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Matter of Henry St. Invs., Ltd. v. BrennanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.