Legal Opinion
Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Chicago, M & St. P. RY. Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 28, 1926No. 4696, 4931, and 5065PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILKERSON, District Judge.
In the consolidated cases against the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company there is pending a hearing on the application of Ernest Iselin and "others for leave to intervene and become parties defendant. The applicants seek permission to act for and represent the stockholders of the railway company herein, and for and on behalf of the railway company, or otherwise, to raise, present, and maintain such contentions, defenses, and issues as the railway company might or could raise, present, or maintain in these proceedings.
Principles which control the granting…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Louisville Trust Co. v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Shaw v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Richter v. JeromeSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Palmer v. Bankers' Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Investment Registry, Ltd. v. Chicago & M. E. R.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Security-First Nat. Bank v. Rindge Land & Navigation Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- In Re New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1968
- Hanna v. Brictson Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Bovay v. TownsendCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Central West Public Service Co. v. CraigCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.