Legal Opinion
Otis v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided April 22, 1941No. Claim No. 25702PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreenberg, J.
The State moves to dismiss the claim on the ground that it fails to allege facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the State of New York. The motion is made upon the claim as filed herein and a stipulation of facts entered upon the record.
*390In accordance with the claim and the stipulation entered into, the facts alleged are, in substance, as follows: that on or about the 21st day of June, 1938, the deceased, Vincent D. Otis, was in the employ of the State of New York and was working in the hold of the steamship Harry L. Findlay, owned and operated by the Kinsman Transit Company…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- The LottawannaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Atlantic Transport Co. of W. Va. v. ImbrovekSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Militano v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
- Maloney v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
- Otis v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1942