Legal Opinion

Lincoln v. Power

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 1, 1916No. 793PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.

1Per curiam

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of (1) In re Luis Oteiza y Cortes, 136 U. S. 330, 334; Ornelas v. Ruiz, 161 U. S. 502, 508; *652Bryant v. The United States, 167 U. S. 104, 105; Terlinden v. Ames, 184 U. S. 270, 278; Elias v. Ramirez, 215 U. S. 398, 406-407; McNamara v. Henkel, 226 U. S. 520, 523; (2) David Kauffman & Sons Co. v. Smith, 216 U. S. 610; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580; Manila Investment Co. v. Trammell, 239 U. S. 31.

Mr. John Neville Boyle and Mr. Addison S. Pratt for the appellant. The Attorney General and Mr. Charles" Fox for the appellees.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Terlinden v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Ornelas v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. In Re Luis Oteiza Y CortesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. McNamara v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Toop v. Ulysses Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sindona v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  2. In re the Extradition of KoskotasDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
  3. United States v. MackinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  4. Ignatius Timothy Tribich Lincoln v. James M. Power, Marshal, EtcSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API