Peterson v. Willbanks
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, P. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) We are of the opinion that the court did not err in sustaining the motion for a nonsuit in this case. The evidence in the case would not have authorized a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, under the allegations of the petition considered and the prayers for the relief sought. This was not a petition for an equitable accounting; in no view of the case was C. H. Peterson entitled to have the property impressed with a trust in his favor. Under the provisions of that item of the will which plaintiffs relied upon in the case as affording them a right to…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Stenger v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Taylor v. GatesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- In Re: Estate of Hazel Williams HelmCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- In re Estate of HelmsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014