Legal Opinion

Siegel v. Addison

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1954PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

The plaintiff has moved for an “ order restoring the above entitled action to the Jury Calendar, Trial Term Day Calendar, for January 18,1954 ”. She has submitted an affidavit sworn to by her, in which she states merely that this is an action for malpractice; that as a result of the defendant’s failure to perform certain dental work he had undertaken, several teeth were devitalized and extracted, causing her to incur a substantial sum for medical expense; that she has made a full disclosure to her attorney, and she has been informed she has a meritorious cause of action; ‘ ‘ wherefore, I…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Klein v. Vernon Lumber Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  2. Schlesinger v. Spingler-Van Beuren Estates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  3. Kemelhor v. KravitzNew York Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marco v. SachsNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Schnur v. GajewskiNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Radar-Electronics, Inc. v. Oscar Leventhal, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  4. Baron v. LehmanNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Capo v. ZachesNew York Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API