Legal Opinion

High Plains Cooperative Ass'n v. Mel Jarvis Construction Co.

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided June 6, 1991No. Nos. CV88-L-224, CV88-L-248Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DAVID L. PIESTER, United States Magistrate Judge.

United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (“USF & G”) has filed a second motion seeking intervention in this action for the purpose of propounding interrogatories to the jury. Although the second motion clarifies a misinterpretation of its first motion, 137 F.R.D. 285, nevertheless, I have concluded to deny permissive intervention in this action.

I am not unsympathetic to USF & G’s request. In the general scheme of things *292it appears to me totally appropriate for a jury to delineate the specific items of damage that it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. High Plains Cooperative Ass'n v. Mel Jarvis Construction Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API