Bil-Jax, Inc. v. Williamson
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
GUNTHER, Judge.
We affirm the trial court’s order denying Bil-Jax, Inc.’s (Bil-Jax) motion to vacate a final judgment on default. The trial court did not grossly abuse its discretion in denying the motion because the movant failed to show facts necessary to support a finding of excusable neglect by the insurer’s New York attorney.
In the instant case, the New York attorney of Bil-Jax’s insurer failed to assign a Florida counsel to defend this lawsuit. As a result, no responsive pleadings were filed and a default and final judgment were entered against Bil-Jax.
On motion to vacate final judgment…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Somero v. Hendry General Hosp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- CE Peters Landclearing, Inc. v. GossingtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Hollywood v. CordascoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- New England Insurance Co. v. International Bank of Miami, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Airmark Engines, Inc. v. Airpark Aviation, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992