Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Floyd

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 25, 2000No. SC 15432Published

1Dissent

KATZ, J., with whom NORCOTT, J.,

joined, dissenting. The majority concludes that the trial court properly found that there had been no implied plea agreement between the state and one of its witnesses, Michael Younger, despite: the state’s lack of opposition to Younger’s motion to reduce a $50,000 bond to a promise to appear; the state’s decision not to charge Younger with a violation of probation for his June 21, 1994 arrest on drug charges; the state’s willingness to continue the proceedings until after Younger had testified as a state’s witness; the evidence from Younger’s attorney…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. United States v. Carol Kozinski, Ilmi Fejzoski, James Havelka, Jeanette Martinez, James Brennan, James Abney, Mark Morgan, and Peter DemopoulosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. Billy George Hughes v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice,institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API