Legal Opinion

Mazer v. Roadrunner Trucking Inc. (In re Espinoza)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico

Decided July 23, 1985No. Bankruptcy No. 7-84-00502 MA; Adv. No. 84-0207 MPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MARK B. McFEELEY, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter came before the Court on the trustee’s complaint to set aside a preferential transfer, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 547. The defendant claims that the debt- or was not insolvent at the time the transfer took place, and that the transfer is thus not preferential. The question before the Court is whether insolvency as used in 11 U.S.C. § 547, is the same as insolvency as defined in 11 U.S.C. § 101(29).

The defendant, Roadrunner Trucking, Inc., obtained a judgment against the debtors on January 18, 1984. This judgment was filed against…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cusick v. Second Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Mazer v. Aetna Finance Co. (In Re Zuni)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 1980
  3. MacK v. Bank of LansingDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1975
  4. Rocky Mountain Ethanol Systems, Inc. v. Mann, Inc. (In Re Rocky Mountain Ethanol Systems, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re WommackUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API