Legal Opinion

Christian v. Betak

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 20, 2024No. 3:24-cv-01867Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DONALD J. CHRISTIAN, Case No. 24-cv-01867-TSH 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART: MOTION TO DISMISS 10 GEORGE M. BETAK, Re: Dkt. No. 26 11 Defendant. 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Pending before the Court is Defendant George M. Betak’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to 15 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 26. Plaintiff Donald J. Christian filed an 16 Opposition (ECF No. 27) and Defendant filed a Reply (ECF No. 28). For the reasons stated 17 below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API