Newman, Jr. v. AECIQ
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EDWARD G. NEWMAN, JR., No. 2:24-cv-1204 WBS AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 AECIQ, 15 Defendant. 16 17 This matter is before the court on a motion to compel brought by plaintiff. ECF No. 20. 18 This discovery motion was referred to the magistrate judge pursuant to E.D. Cal. R. 302(c)(1). 19 The parties submitted the required joint statement. ECF No. 21. The matter was heard before the 20 court on June 4, 2025. ECF No. 24. For the reasons set forth below, the motion to compel is 21 GRANTED. 22 I.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Gusman v. Comcast Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2014
- Kelly v. Delaware River Joint CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950