Legal Opinion
Carey v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 6, 1962PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Per curiam
We are in accord with the disposition of the Appellate Division in modifying the order of Special Term.
This appeal, the facts of which have been sufficiently set forth in the opinions below, results from a motion to compel the arbi*456tration of three grievances. Arbitration has been ordered as to one, and denied as to the others.
Whether the grievance at the Mansfield, Ohio, plant actually concerns rehiring or discharge is properly a matter to be decided by the arbitrator. Furthermore, the company is not prejudiced by the inartful manner in which the complaint was originally drawn, since it…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Marine Engineers Beneficial Ass'n v. Interlake Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Matter of Zimmerman v. . CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Thomas D. Ramsey v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
- In re Arbitration between the Board of Education & Auburn TeachersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- National Labor Relations Board v. American Printers and LithographersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- In re the Arbitration between Kansas City & Marine InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.