Legal Opinion · Dissent

Vees v. Carbon County Board of Assessment Appeals

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 8, 2005Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

I respectfully dissent. The majority holds that the Carbon County (County) Board of Assessment Appeals’ (Board) reassessment of eighty-five acres of unimproved land (Property) owned by Raymond R. Vees and Kathleen A. Vees (collectively, Taxpayers) does not violate the uniformity clause of the Pennsylvania Constitution or the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution. (Majority op. at 749-50.) For the following reasons, I disagree.

Taxpayers paid $170,000 for the Property in 2002, and the Board assessed the Property at $45,000 based on a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Lancaster v. County of LancasterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. City of Harrisburg v. Dauphin County Board of Assessment AppealsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Millcreek Township School District v. Erie County Board of Assessment AppealsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Downingtown Area School District v. Chester County Board of Assessment AppealsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Wilkinsburg School District v. Board of Property AssessmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API